Ok don’t laugh, but I kinda did something stupid. I got excited about the new simple pairing feature in Bluetooth 2.1 +EDR, so I rushed out and got one of the first Bluetooth dongles that supported the new spec. I couldn’t wait to receive it. After I opened the package, I realized something. I just got the equivalent of (1) walkie-talkie. The main reason why I got the new dongle was to test out the new simple pairing feature, which would mean that I would (of course) need another Bluetooth device that supported the 2.1 spec.
So, I’ve been on a quest to find a really cool device that supports the 2.1 +EDR spec. So, have you guessed it yet? What’s going to be the first mobile device in 2009 to support Bluetooth 2.1? Is it…
- Apple iPhone? No.
- Blackberry Storm? No.
- Nokia N97? No.
- Sony Ericsson C905? No.
Its the Palm Pre:

Now before I sing the praises of this device, can I remind us all of a little history? Over 13 years ago, the cellphone market was not the growth sector as it is today, and the mobile and handheld market was really all about PDAs. Toshiba and Sharp introduced one of the first official PDAs in the market, and then Apple stole the show with their PDA, the Apple Newton. All the PDAs on the market had similar capabilities (notetaking, appointment book, calculator, etc) but Apple’s claim-to-fame was the fact that it the best handwriting recognition available. The Netwton became an instant success and completely dominated the market. Unfortunately, Apple didn’t listen to the developer community who wanted better access to the APIs of the system. Apple also ignored the consumers who wanted a smaller form factor and nearly flawless character recognition. So what happened?
A newcomer arose out of nowhere in the PDA market named Palm (at that time it was US Robitics) and introduced a PDA that could comfortably fit in your pocket and could recognize characters 2x faster and more efficient than the big-bad-Newton. Palm also introduced a better synchronization technology that synchronized your desktop and PDA 10-20x faster than anybody else, including Apple. Developers flocked to the Palm platform because it was more open compared to the Newton APIs (even though Palm had the uphill battle of being the new-guy-with-the-new-API). In a matter of years, Palm became the #1 PDA, and Apple could never catch up because they refused to change.
So what’s the point of all this mobile computing history? I said all this because I think we’re about to see it happen all over again. I like Apple’s products, but as a developer, it can be very frustrating to work with them, especially for the iPhone. The Bluetooth APIs are very restrictive (boo!) and why can’t we do any tethering, Bluetooth or otherwise?. Did you know that you have to own an Apple computer to write code for the iPhone? Consumers want tactile feedback in order to type quickly, but Apple will *never* make a keyboard for the iPhone because they’re too arrogant about their design. Is it too much to ask to get a user replaceable battery?
Now of course, every new smart phone on the market will have the standard touch screen, accelerometer sensor, large display, and GPS chip. The Palm Pre adds the following features, that set it apart from the other contenders:
- Bluetooth 2.1 +EDR (now I have a device to do simple-paring with!)
- Bluetooth tethering (very nice - I have no idea why Apple and RIM refuse to support it)
- A real keyboard (so people can type faster)
- A user replaceable battery
- Wireless power charging!
So, needless to say, I’m excited about this device. I’m anticipating information on the Bluetooth API support (of course).